PHIL 347N - Wk 3 Checkpoint Quiz.

1. According to the text, how do the views of stronger, more developed critical thinkers
toward authority differ from those in earlier stages of cognitive development? (pg. 116-
117)

2. Briefly, in your own words, state how the text defines “expert.” (pg. 134)

3. When presented with a claim unsupported by reasons (for example, “the health risks of
vaping have been underestimated”), what three options does a critical thinker have to
evaluate such a claim

4. Is the following statement true or untrue? Explain your answer. “If a claim cannot
be confirmed by an independent investigation, then it must be false.” (pg. 130-
131)

5. Is the following statement true or untrue? Explain your answer. “If we do not
believe that a claim is true, then we must believe that the claim is false.” (pg.
132-33)
6. What four conditions must an argument meet if we are to accept the worthiness
and reasonableness of its conclusions?

7. In an argument with two or more independent reasons, if one of those reasons
turns out to be false, how does a critical thinker apply the test of logical strength
to the argument? Should the critical thinker reject such an argument? Explain
your answer.
Our text states, "before determining that a claim should be rejected, a strong critical thinker would first
need to find problems with the soundness of all the arguments being advanced (Facione & Gittens,
2016, p. 144)."
8. Erwin is charged with statutory rape, which is defined as a having sex with a
minor, a person under the age of 18. Erwin argues: “You can’t arrest me just
because she’s 17 and I’m 21. Yes, we had sex, but it was consensual, plus she
will be 18 in two weeks, and we are planning to get married.” Which of the four
tests of worthiness does Erwin’s argument fail? Explain your answer. Pg. 143